{"id":37502,"date":"2023-09-07T15:49:54","date_gmt":"2023-09-07T10:19:54","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/j-m-j-essential-oil-company-v-cit-2023453-itr-754-292-taxman-314-sc\/"},"modified":"2023-09-07T15:49:54","modified_gmt":"2023-09-07T10:19:54","slug":"j-m-j-essential-oil-company-v-cit-2023453-itr-754-292-taxman-314-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/j-m-j-essential-oil-company-v-cit-2023453-itr-754-292-taxman-314-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"J. M. J. Essential Oil Company v. CIT (2023)453 ITR 754\/ 292 Taxman 314 (SC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On appeal by the Department against the order of the Tribunal setting aside the penalty levied on the assessee under section\u00a0271(1)(c)\u00a0of the\u00a0Income-tax Act, 1961, the High Court allowed the appeal of the Revenue holding that merely because the value added tax authorities had accepted the cash sales set up by the assessee that was not sufficient ground to hold that the cash sales set up by the assessee were genuine, that the Assessing Officer and the appellate authority, had rightly given a finding of fact that the cash sales were not genuine and the assessee had introduced its unaccounted income in the garb of cash sales. The High Court restored the penalty in view of inaccurate particulars of income furnished by the assessee in the garb of fictitious cash sales with a view to claim exemption under section 80IC of the Act.\u00a0 SLP of assessee is dismissed.(AY. 2007-08)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 271(1)(c) : Penalty -Concealment -Cash sales &#8211; Value Added Tax Authorities accepting cash Sales-  Independent finding of  fact that the  assessee had introduced  unaccounted income as cash sales \u2014Inaccurate particulars of income -Levy of penalty affirmed by High court -SLP of assessee is dismissed. [S.80IAC, Art, 136] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37502","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-9KS","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37502","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37502"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37502\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":37503,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37502\/revisions\/37503"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37502"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37502"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37502"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}