{"id":37796,"date":"2023-10-16T11:49:40","date_gmt":"2023-10-16T06:19:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/north-end-foods-marketing-p-ltd-v-dy-cit-2023-291-taxman-482-delhihc\/"},"modified":"2023-10-16T11:49:40","modified_gmt":"2023-10-16T06:19:40","slug":"north-end-foods-marketing-p-ltd-v-dy-cit-2023-291-taxman-482-delhihc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/north-end-foods-marketing-p-ltd-v-dy-cit-2023-291-taxman-482-delhihc\/","title":{"rendered":"North End Foods Marketing (P.) Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2023) 291 Taxman 482 (Delhi)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>A show cause notice was issued upon assessee to provide information regarding accommodation entries received by it from an entity, namely, Surya Trading Company (STC).\u00a0\u00a0 No reply was received, another notice was issued under section 148A(b) and reassessment proceeding was initiated. Assessee filed a writ petition against the said notice contending that\u00a0 the\u00a0 said transaction was done in course of business. Dismissing the petition the Court held that\u00a0 the\u00a0 assessee had not placed on record any documents explaining and substantiating nature of its transaction with Surya Trading Company\u00a0 (STC).\u00a0 Further, revenue&#8217;s contention that assessee was beneficiary of an accommodation entry and assessee&#8217;s contention that transaction was done in course of business were rival pleas and their determination was pure question of fact, which was to be determined by statutory authorities after appreciation of evidence. Writ petition was dismissed.(AY. 2013-14)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Accommodation entries-No reply was filed-Disputed facts-Writ petition was dismissed.[S.133(6) 148A(b), Art. 226]   <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37796","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-9PC","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37796","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37796"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37796\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":37797,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37796\/revisions\/37797"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37796"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37796"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37796"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}