{"id":37802,"date":"2023-10-16T11:51:30","date_gmt":"2023-10-16T06:21:30","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/boeing-company-v-uoi-2023-291-taxman-406-delhihc\/"},"modified":"2023-10-16T11:51:30","modified_gmt":"2023-10-16T06:21:30","slug":"boeing-company-v-uoi-2023-291-taxman-406-delhihc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/boeing-company-v-uoi-2023-291-taxman-406-delhihc\/","title":{"rendered":"Boeing Company v. UOI (2023) 291 Taxman 406 (Delhi)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In writ petition against the issue of notice under section 148 of the Act,\u00a0 the In response\u00a0 to notice the assessee contended that receipts from providing licensed material and ancillary services did not qualify either as royalty or fees for technical services in terms of article 12 of India-USA DTAA and therefore there was no income escaping assessment\u00a0 warranting exercise of jurisdiction under section 148 of the Act. \u00a0The assessee also contended that they have also furnished\u00a0 Tax Residency Certificate prior to passing of an order under section 148A(d) of the Act.\u00a0 \u00a0Allowing the petition the Court held that since the reply filed by the assessee was had not been properly considered, the\u00a0 orders\u00a0 were set aside with\u00a0 a direction to the Assessing Officer to deal with contentions and submissions advanced by the assessee and pass\u00a0 fresh orders under section 148A(d) of the Act. (AY. 2016-17, 2017-18)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Income deemed to accrue or arise in India-Royalty-Fees for technical services-Tax residency certificate-Reply filed by the assessee was  had not been properly considered-Orders set aside-DTAA-India-Singapore-USA [S.9(1)(vi), 9(1)(vii),148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 12, Art, 226] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-37802","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-9PI","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37802","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=37802"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37802\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":37803,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/37802\/revisions\/37803"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=37802"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=37802"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=37802"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}