{"id":38134,"date":"2023-12-11T13:01:37","date_gmt":"2023-12-11T07:31:37","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/kamal-nayan-singh-v-dy-cit-2023-292-taxman-289-jharkhandhc\/"},"modified":"2023-12-11T13:01:37","modified_gmt":"2023-12-11T07:31:37","slug":"kamal-nayan-singh-v-dy-cit-2023-292-taxman-289-jharkhandhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/kamal-nayan-singh-v-dy-cit-2023-292-taxman-289-jharkhandhc\/","title":{"rendered":"Kamal Nayan Singh v. DY. CIT (2023) 292 Taxman 289 (Jharkhand)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Tribunal passed order dated 23-12-2009 which was communicated to assessee on 2-8-2010.\u00a0 Assessee filed miscellaneous application on 3-6-2014 for reconsideration of matter. Tribunal dismissed\u00a0 the application on ground of period of limitation. On appeal the Court held that\u00a0 the application for rectification was filed by assessee much prior to amendment made in section 254(2) which came into effect from 1-6-2016 and\u00a0 application was submitted within a period of four years from date of actual receipt of judgment and order passed by Tribunal. Accordingly the\u00a0 Tribunal had committed gross error in complying law prevalent on date of hearing and not law prevalent at date of filing of miscellaneous application. Matter was to be remanded to Tribunal to decide same on merit. [BP. 1996-97 to 2002-03)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 254(2) : Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Limitation-Rectification was filed  much prior to amendment made in section 254(2) which came into effect from 1-6-2016-Within a period of four years from date of actual receipt of judgment-Law prevailing on date of filing of miscellaneous application to be applied-Order of Tribunal is set aside. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38134","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-9V4","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38134","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38134"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38134\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38135,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38134\/revisions\/38135"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38134"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38134"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38134"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}