{"id":38720,"date":"2024-02-01T14:06:46","date_gmt":"2024-02-01T08:36:46","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/legend-steel-p-ltd-v-uoi-2023-294-taxman-564-orissa-hc\/"},"modified":"2024-02-01T14:06:46","modified_gmt":"2024-02-01T08:36:46","slug":"legend-steel-p-ltd-v-uoi-2023-294-taxman-564-orissa-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/legend-steel-p-ltd-v-uoi-2023-294-taxman-564-orissa-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Legend Steel (P.) Ltd. v. UOI (2023) 294 Taxman 564 (Orissa) (HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Against the additions made under section 68 of the Act, the assessee preferred an appeal before the CIT(A).When the appeal was pending\u00a0 the assessee also made an application for stay of revovery proceeedings. The\u00a0 Assessing Officer\u00a0 directed assessee to pay 20 per cent of outstanding demand and stated in letter that if assessee had applied for stay of demand, furnish copy of order of stay of demand granted, if any. On writ the court held that\u00a0 since stay application was not considered\u00a0 by the Assessing Officer\u00a0 the\u00a0 Assessing Officer was directed to consider stay application and pass order under provision in sub-section (6) of section 220\u00a0 of the Act, Referred, Circulars and Notification: CBDT Office Memorandum [F. No. 404\/72\/93-ITCC], dated 31-7-2017.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 220 : Collection and recovery-Assessee deemed in default-Cash credits-Pendency of stay application-Assessing Officer was directed to consider the stay application and pass an order. [S. 68, 220(6), 250,  Art. 226] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38720","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-a4w","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38720","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38720"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38720\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38721,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38720\/revisions\/38721"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38720"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38720"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38720"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}