{"id":38966,"date":"2024-02-02T16:01:10","date_gmt":"2024-02-02T10:31:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/cit-v-n-sasikala-2023454-itr-387-madhc\/"},"modified":"2024-02-02T16:01:10","modified_gmt":"2024-02-02T10:31:10","slug":"cit-v-n-sasikala-2023454-itr-387-madhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/cit-v-n-sasikala-2023454-itr-387-madhc\/","title":{"rendered":"CIT v. N. Sasikala (2023)454 ITR 387 (Mad)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Allowing the appeal of the Revenue the Court held that the Appellate Tribunal was at fault while passing the order. It ought to have seen the mistakes committed by the Assessing Officer which resulted in an erroneous order being passed in favour of the assessee which was prejudicial to the interests of the Revenue. The power was rightly exercised by the Commissioner while invoking section\u00a0263\u00a0of the Act. Therefore, the Tribunal erred in allowing the assessee\u2019s appeal.\u00a0 Court also held that\u00a0 Interlocutory order passed by Commissioner (Appeals) is\u00a0 not binding on Tribunal. \u00a0(AY. 1994-95)<\/p>\n<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue  Revision-Failure to consider report of  Directorate of  Vigilance and Anti-Corruption-Order is erroneous-Order of the Tribunal is set aside-Interlocutory order passed by Commissioner (Appeals) is  not binding on Tribunal. [S. 254(1) 260A] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-38966","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-a8u","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38966","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=38966"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38966\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":38967,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/38966\/revisions\/38967"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=38966"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=38966"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=38966"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}