{"id":41211,"date":"2024-04-02T15:48:10","date_gmt":"2024-04-02T10:18:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/dy-cit-it-v-aecom-asia-company-ltd-2023-199-itd-364-101-itr-75-sn-delhi-trib\/"},"modified":"2024-04-02T15:48:10","modified_gmt":"2024-04-02T10:18:10","slug":"dy-cit-it-v-aecom-asia-company-ltd-2023-199-itd-364-101-itr-75-sn-delhi-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/dy-cit-it-v-aecom-asia-company-ltd-2023-199-itd-364-101-itr-75-sn-delhi-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"Dy. CIT (IT) v.Aecom Asia Company Ltd. (2023) 199 ITD 364 \/ 101 ITR 75 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Held, that the Tribunal while dealing with a similar issue for the AY\u00a02010-11\u00a0in the assessee\u2019s own case having held that the Assessing Officer had justified the addition based on \u201crelation\u201d of services to the project office whereas the provisions of section\u00a044DA\u00a0require the contract, right or property to be \u201ceffectively connected\u201d as against mere \u201crelated\u201d, that since in this case, the situs of performance of the activities was outside India, the effective connection was not there with the project office, that the assessee had offered the fee for technical services on gross basis and the activities conducted outside India were not effectively connected with the project office in India, that the assessee had rightly offered the overseas consultancy income as fees for technical services under the provisions of section\u00a0115A\u00a0of the Act, the addition made under section\u00a044DA\u00a0of the Act was liable to be deleted.(AY. 2011-12)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 115A : Foreign companies-Tax-Dividends-Royalty-Technical   services fees-Non resident-Addition made under section 44DA. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41211","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-aIH","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41211","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41211"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41211\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41212,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41211\/revisions\/41212"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41211"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41211"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41211"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}