{"id":41440,"date":"2024-04-08T18:22:28","date_gmt":"2024-04-08T12:52:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/anju-singh-v-ccit-2023459-itr-705-154-taxmann-com-191-pathc\/"},"modified":"2024-04-08T18:22:28","modified_gmt":"2024-04-08T12:52:28","slug":"anju-singh-v-ccit-2023459-itr-705-154-taxmann-com-191-pathc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/anju-singh-v-ccit-2023459-itr-705-154-taxmann-com-191-pathc\/","title":{"rendered":"Anju Singh v. CCIT (2023)459 ITR 705\/154 taxmann.com 191 (Pat)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dismissing the petition the Court held that \u00a0that the Assessing Officer had information based on which an initial notice under section\u00a0148A(b)\u00a0was issued to the assessee. The copy of the report of the Investigation Wing was available with the Assessing Officer and was provided to the assessee. The information or the investigation report was not wholly irrelevant for exercise of power under section\u00a0147. The assessee was at liberty to raise all the contentions consequent to the issuance of notice under section\u00a0148\u00a0in the reassessment proceedings under section\u00a0147. The order under section\u00a0148A(d)\u00a0did not suffer from non-application of mind or violation of principles of natural justice. There was no breach of any mandatory requirement stipulated under section\u00a0148A.The writ petition is dismissed. (AY.2018-19)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Copy of  report of  Investigation Wing for formation of  opinion is made available-No violation of principle of natural justice-Writ petition is dismissed.[S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]   <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41440","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-aMo","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41440","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41440"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41440\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41441,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41440\/revisions\/41441"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41440"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41440"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41440"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}