{"id":41953,"date":"2024-05-04T11:35:40","date_gmt":"2024-05-04T06:05:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/acit-v-mahendra-kumar-agarwal-2023104-itr-455-jaipur-trib\/"},"modified":"2024-05-04T11:35:40","modified_gmt":"2024-05-04T06:05:40","slug":"acit-v-mahendra-kumar-agarwal-2023104-itr-455-jaipur-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/acit-v-mahendra-kumar-agarwal-2023104-itr-455-jaipur-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"ACIT v. Mahendra Kumar Agarwal (2023)104 ITR 455 (Jaipur) (Trib)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>For the A.Y.\u00a02017-18, the Assessing Officer made addition u\/s.\u00a068\u00a0read with section\u00a0115BBE\u00a0of the\u00a0Act of the large cash deposit of demonetised currency made by the assessee, treating it as his undisclosed income.<\/p>\n<p>Tribunal held that it was apparent from the summary of the assessee\u2019s cash book that the cash balance was generated from cash sales and such sales were part of the total sales credited in the trading account, the income wherefrom had already been offered by the assessee by reducing the cost of sales from the sales. The Assessing Officer had not pointed out any defect in the cash books and other books of account. The sales were duly supported by the sale bills and invoices and duly verifiable from the books of account including the stock register. Further, the availability of stocks in hand showed that the sales made by the assessee were genuine and duly recorded in the books of account. Moreover, the cash sales conformed to the assessee\u2019s own previous history and trend, indicating an increase over the previous year of 14.89 per cent., which was quite reasonable.\u00a0 Additions rightly deleted by the CIT(A).(AY. 2017-18)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 68 : Cash credits-Unexplained money-Cash deposit during demonetisation-Cash sales-Books of accounts accepted-No defect pointed out-Deletion of addition is valid.[S.115BBE]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-41953","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-aUF","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41953","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=41953"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41953\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":41954,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/41953\/revisions\/41954"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=41953"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=41953"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=41953"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}