{"id":42161,"date":"2024-05-04T13:08:50","date_gmt":"2024-05-04T07:38:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pawan-green-channels-pvt-ltd-v-dy-cit-2023101-itr-19-sn-chennai-trib-2\/"},"modified":"2024-05-04T13:08:50","modified_gmt":"2024-05-04T07:38:50","slug":"pawan-green-channels-pvt-ltd-v-dy-cit-2023101-itr-19-sn-chennai-trib-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pawan-green-channels-pvt-ltd-v-dy-cit-2023101-itr-19-sn-chennai-trib-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Pawan Green Channels Pvt. Ltd v. Dy. CIT (2023)101 ITR 19 (SN) (Chennai) (Trib)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Held that although the name of the company had been struck off from Register of Companies, the assessee officially did not communicate to the Assessing Officer about the striking off of the name of the company. Thus, the assessee\u2019s contention that the notice of reassessment issued after dissolution of the company was invalid and the consequent reassessment proceedings null and void was not tenable. \u00a0Reassessment for the assessmentyear 2003-04 is quashed\u00a0 as the Commissioner had granted approval instead of the Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner as prescribed under the law.As regards the quantum of addition\u00a0 ,the\u00a0 matter is\u00a0 remanded.\u00a0\u00a0 (AY.2003-04 to 2005-06)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Dissolution of Company-Name of the company had been struck off from Register of Companies-Not intimidated to Assessing Officer-Notice is valid-Sanction-Reassessment for the assessmentyear 2003-04 is quashed  as the Commissioner had granted approval instead of the Additional Commissioner or Joint Commissioner as prescribed under the law-Quantum of addition-Matter remanded. [S. 69, 147,151] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42161","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-aY1","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42161","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42161"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42161\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":42162,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42161\/revisions\/42162"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42161"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42161"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42161"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}