{"id":42896,"date":"2024-05-17T16:24:48","date_gmt":"2024-05-17T10:54:48","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/jayshri-propack-p-ltd-v-acit-2023-198-itd-17-ahd-trib\/"},"modified":"2024-05-17T16:24:48","modified_gmt":"2024-05-17T10:54:48","slug":"jayshri-propack-p-ltd-v-acit-2023-198-itd-17-ahd-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/jayshri-propack-p-ltd-v-acit-2023-198-itd-17-ahd-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"Jayshri Propack (P.) Ltd. v. ACIT (2023) 198 ITD 17 (Ahd) (Trib.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Assessee-company issued equity shares at face value of Rs. 10 with a premium of Rs. 6\/Rs. 9. The AO\u00a0 held that the valuation itwas not as per rule 11UA or not as per any certificate furnished by Chartered Accountant or Merchant Banker as prescribed under rule 11U.He\u00a0 made addition by invoking provisions of section 56(2)(viib) of the Act.\u00a0 Commissioner (Appeals) confirmed order of Assessing Officer. On appeal the Tribunal held\u00a0\u00a0 that provisions of section 56(2)(viib) did not prescribe only one method for valuation of fair market value of shares and assessee could also justify fair market value of shares based on valuation of its assets as on date of issue of shares including both tangible and intangible assets. The finding of lower authorities that valuation of fair market value of shares as per rule 11UA was not correct was not in accordance with law. Matter remanded to the\u00a0 Assessing Officer to consider the valuation report submitted by the assessee.\u00a0 (AY. 2015-16)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 56 : Income from other sources-Shares issued at premium-Matter remanded to the  Assessing Officer to consider the valuation report submitted by the assessee.  [S. 56(2)(viib) R.11U, 11UA] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-42896","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-b9S","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42896","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=42896"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42896\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":42897,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/42896\/revisions\/42897"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=42896"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=42896"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=42896"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}