{"id":43326,"date":"2024-06-07T20:11:53","date_gmt":"2024-06-07T14:41:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/tata-aia-life-insurance-company-ltd-v-pcit-2023-199-itd-247-mum-trib\/"},"modified":"2024-06-07T20:11:53","modified_gmt":"2024-06-07T14:41:53","slug":"tata-aia-life-insurance-company-ltd-v-pcit-2023-199-itd-247-mum-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/tata-aia-life-insurance-company-ltd-v-pcit-2023-199-itd-247-mum-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"Tata AIA Life Insurance Company Ltd. v. PCIT (2023) 199 ITD 247 (Mum) (Trib.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>\u00a0Assessee is\u00a0 carrying on life insurance business in India. The\u00a0 Assessing Officer taxed surplus available in shareholders account along with insurance business while computing taxable income. Commissioner invoked revision jurisdiction on the ground that the\u00a0 order passed by Assessing Officer was prejudicial to interest of revenue as income\/funds in shareholders account was taxable separately at rate of 30 per cent instead of 12 per cent as applicable on insurance business income.\u00a0 On appeal the Tribunal held that since the\u00a0 Assessing Officer had made adequate enquiries on treatment of income in shareholders account as part of life insurance business and its taxation under section 115B during course of assessment proceedings, Revision order is quashed. (AY. 2017-18)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Insurance business-Income\/funds in shareholders account was taxable separately at rate of 30 per cent instead of 12 per cent-Revision order is quashed. [S.44, 115B] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43326","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-bgO","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43326","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43326"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43326\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":43327,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43326\/revisions\/43327"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43326"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43326"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43326"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}