{"id":43987,"date":"2024-06-27T13:53:26","date_gmt":"2024-06-27T08:23:26","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/acit-v-justice-n-kannadasan-2023103-itr-590-223-ttj-331-223-dtr-329-chennai-trib\/"},"modified":"2024-06-27T13:53:26","modified_gmt":"2024-06-27T08:23:26","slug":"acit-v-justice-n-kannadasan-2023103-itr-590-223-ttj-331-223-dtr-329-chennai-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/acit-v-justice-n-kannadasan-2023103-itr-590-223-ttj-331-223-dtr-329-chennai-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"ACIT v. Justice N. Kannadasan (2023)103 ITR 590\/223 TTJ 331\/ 223 DTR 329 (Chennai) (Trib)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dismissing the appeal of the Revenue and allowing that of the assessee, the Tribunal held\u00a0 that the Commissioner (Appeals) had only directed the Assessing Officer to examine the supporting documents and had only allowed the claim of deduction under section\u00a054F\u00a0in principle. This was not akin to setting aside the issue or remanding the matter to the Assessing Officer. There was no violation of section\u00a0251(1)(a)\u00a0and, hence, no infirmity in the order of the Commissioner (Appeals).As regards banking transactions\u00a0\u00a0 the assessee is\u00a0\u00a0 given one more chance to produce the dematerialised account and details of banking transactions to prove the incurrence of loss and to quantify it and matter is remanded to the Assessing Officer. AY.2012-13 to 2014-15)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 251 : Appeal-Commissioner (Appeals)-Powers-Commissioner (Appeals) directing Assessing Officer to verify and allow claim-Not tantamount to setting aside or  remanding matter to Assessing Officer-No violation-Order is up held-Other issues matter is remanded to the Assessing Officer. [S.54F, 69, 251 (1)(a)] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-43987","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-brt","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43987","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=43987"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43987\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":43988,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/43987\/revisions\/43988"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=43987"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=43987"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=43987"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}