{"id":44694,"date":"2024-07-27T17:38:32","date_gmt":"2024-07-27T12:08:32","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/ganpati-international-v-pcit-2023105-itr-266chd-trib\/"},"modified":"2024-07-27T17:38:32","modified_gmt":"2024-07-27T12:08:32","slug":"ganpati-international-v-pcit-2023105-itr-266chd-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/ganpati-international-v-pcit-2023105-itr-266chd-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"Ganpati International v. PCIT (2023)105 ITR 266(Chd) (Trib)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Held that the Principal Commissioner did not state either in the show-cause notice or in his order the creditors from whom the alleged amount of Rs. 2,00,00,000 had been received by the assessee, which amount was not the amount of unsecured loan accepted by the assessee during the year, for which the assessee\u2019s explanation was ignored by the Principal Commissioner. Instruction No. 7 of 2017, dated July 21, 2017 ([2017 396 ITR (St.) 36), of the Central Board of Direct Taxes stating that on acceptance of the audit objection, it was incumbent upon the Principal Commissioner to take action under section 263 was not accepted by the jurisdictional High Court, which rule was binding on the other courts. The assessee\u2019s grievance was justified and to be accepted as such.\u00a0 Revision order is quashed. (AY. 2015-16)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 263  :  Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Loans-Creditors-Opinion of  internal audit machinery not binding on  him-Revision is quashed. [S. 143(3)] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-44694","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-bCS","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44694","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=44694"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44694\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":44695,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/44694\/revisions\/44695"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=44694"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=44694"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=44694"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}