{"id":47276,"date":"2024-10-17T13:12:40","date_gmt":"2024-10-17T07:42:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/louis-dreyfus-company-india-pvt-ltd-v-dy-cit2024-464-itr-595-338-ctr-149-delhihc\/"},"modified":"2024-10-17T13:12:40","modified_gmt":"2024-10-17T07:42:40","slug":"louis-dreyfus-company-india-pvt-ltd-v-dy-cit2024-464-itr-595-338-ctr-149-delhihc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/louis-dreyfus-company-india-pvt-ltd-v-dy-cit2024-464-itr-595-338-ctr-149-delhihc\/","title":{"rendered":"Louis Dreyfus Company India Pvt. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT(2024) 464 ITR 595\/ 338 CTR 149 (Delhi)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Allowing the petition the Court held\u00a0 that the Transfer Pricing Officer could not have resumed proceedings post the passing of the directions under section\u00a0144C(5)\u00a0by the Dispute Resolution Panel on June 20, 2022. The role of the Transfer Pricing Officer ended once an order as contemplated under section\u00a092CA(4)\u00a0had been passed and remitted to the Assessing Officer. Therefore, there was no occasion for the directive of the Dispute Resolution Panel to be uploaded on the Income-tax Business Application portal on June 24, 2022. It was additionally stated to have been dispatched through speed post to the Transfer Pricing Officer and the Additional\/Joint\/Deputy\/Assistant Commissioner, National Faceless Assessment Centre on June 27, 2022. It was thereafter that the Transfer Pricing Officer had passed the order dated July 25, 2022. According to the provisions of E-Assessment Scheme, 2019, all orders, notices and decisions have to be necessarily uploaded on the portal and as part of the larger faceless assessment regime which now holds the field. The uploading of the directive of the Dispute Resolution Panel on the portal would thus constitute valid and sufficient service and the period of limitation as prescribed in section\u00a0144C(13)\u00a0would be liable to be computed. Accordingly, the order of assessment could have been framed lastly by July 31, 2022. The order of assessment, dated August 24, 2022, passed under section\u00a0143(3)\u00a0read with section\u00a0144C(13)\u00a0and the notice of penalty, dated August 24, 2022, under section\u00a0270A\u00a0read with section\u00a0274\u00a0were quashed and set aside. The Deputy Commissioner had failed to comply with the mandatory timelines stipulated in the provisions under section\u00a0144C(13)\u00a0to implement the directives of the Dispute Resolution Panel under section\u00a0144C(5). Therefore, the return as submitted by the assessee would be deemed to have been accepted and the tax liability worked out accordingly.\u00a0 Original return of\u00a0 income\u00a0 is directed to be accepted.Order and penalty notice\u00a0 is set aside. (AY.2018-19) <\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 144C : Reference to dispute resolution panel-Faceless Assessment-Limitation-Penalty-Draft assessment order-Transfer Pricing Officer has no role after directions issued by Dispute Resolution Panel-Directions binding on Assessing Officer-Order is  time-barred-Original return of  income  is directed to be accepted-Order and penalty notice set aside. [S. 92CA(4), 143(3), 144C(5), 144C(13), 156, 270A, 274, Art. 226] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-47276","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-ciw","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47276","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47276"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47276\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47277,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47276\/revisions\/47277"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47276"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47276"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47276"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}