{"id":47426,"date":"2024-10-31T09:09:03","date_gmt":"2024-10-31T03:39:03","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/hindustan-export-and-import-corporation-p-ltd-v-dy-cit-2024465-itr-412-162-taxmann-com-275-bomhc\/"},"modified":"2024-10-31T09:09:03","modified_gmt":"2024-10-31T03:39:03","slug":"hindustan-export-and-import-corporation-p-ltd-v-dy-cit-2024465-itr-412-162-taxmann-com-275-bomhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/hindustan-export-and-import-corporation-p-ltd-v-dy-cit-2024465-itr-412-162-taxmann-com-275-bomhc\/","title":{"rendered":"Hindustan Export and Import Corporation P. Ltd. v. Dy. CIT (2024)465 ITR 412\/162 taxmann.com 275 (Bom)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dismissing the appeal the Court held that\u00a0 The Chief Commissioner had ordered the Assessing Officer to determine the amount eligible for deduction. Even otherwise, the Assessing Officer, under the Act itself was responsible for ensuring the regularity of returns of income in his jurisdiction and had the authority to examine them, ask for supporting documents, recompute the taxable income and issue assessment orders and raise tax demands. The Assessing Officer also had the power to ask for books of account, documents and other evidence from the assessee to verify the accuracy and completeness of the return of income filed. The order of the Tribunal rejecting the deduction under section\u00a080-O\u00a0was not interfered with. (AY.1995-96)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 80-O : Royalties-Foreign enterprises-Royalty or fees received from foreign entity-Mere claim of  sending newspaper cuttings does not amount to proof of  sharing commercial expertise-No evidence for provision of  information to foreign entity-Deduction rightly rejected by Tribunal.[S. 260A]  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-47426","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-ckW","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47426","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=47426"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47426\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":47427,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/47426\/revisions\/47427"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=47426"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=47426"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=47426"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}