{"id":48134,"date":"2024-11-20T09:44:50","date_gmt":"2024-11-20T04:14:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/dhanwan-leasing-and-finance-co-ltd-v-ito-2024-205-itd-259indore-trib\/"},"modified":"2024-11-20T09:44:50","modified_gmt":"2024-11-20T04:14:50","slug":"dhanwan-leasing-and-finance-co-ltd-v-ito-2024-205-itd-259indore-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/dhanwan-leasing-and-finance-co-ltd-v-ito-2024-205-itd-259indore-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"Dhanwan Leasing and Finance Co. Ltd. v. ITO (2024) 205 ITD 259(Indore) (Trib.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>In course of appellate proceedings, assessee raised a ground challenging validity of reassessment proceedings.\u00a0 However, same was dismissed by Tribunal being not pressed by assessee.\u00a0 Assessee filed\u00a0 application seeking recall of Tribunal&#8217;s order on ground that its Counsel had withdrawn said ground without having any authority to do so. Dismissing the application the Tribunal held that\u00a0 the\u00a0 assessee had given authority to his counsel to appear and present assessee before Tribunal. Such authority is\u00a0 fullest, unlimited and unrestricted and there is no rider mentioned therein. Since assessee had specifically authorized his Counsel to compound matters wherever necessary and withdrawal\/non-pressing of ground by Counsel was within power and authority being representative of assessee,\u00a0 application filed by assessee is\u00a0 rejected. (AY. 2010-11)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 254(2) :  Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Power to recall and to pass any order-Authority letter-Authority to  counsel to appear and present before Tribunal-Authority is fullest, unlimited and unrestricted and there is  no rider mentioned therein, withdrawal\/non-pressing of ground by counsel-Tribunal had accepted withdrawal\/non-pressing without authority of counsel is devoid of any merit and is  rejected. [S. 254(1)] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-48134","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-cwm","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48134","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=48134"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48134\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":48135,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/48134\/revisions\/48135"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=48134"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=48134"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=48134"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}