{"id":4851,"date":"2019-04-10T13:00:05","date_gmt":"2019-04-10T13:00:05","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/himmatbhai-m-viradiya-v-ito-2019-261-taxman-132-bom-hc\/"},"modified":"2019-08-18T14:52:10","modified_gmt":"2019-08-18T14:52:10","slug":"himmatbhai-m-viradiya-v-ito-2019-261-taxman-132-bom-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/himmatbhai-m-viradiya-v-ito-2019-261-taxman-132-bom-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Himmatbhai M. Viradiya v. ITO (2019) 261 Taxman 132\/ 308 CTR 771 \/ 174 DTR 251 (Bom.)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Return was processed under section 143(1) without scrutiny\u2013Objections for reassessment proceedings was rejected.\u00a0 Assessee filed the\u00a0 petition contending that A.O. had supplied two sets of reasons and it was not clear which reasons were existing on record when sanction from Principal Commissioner was obtained and impugned notice was issued. Rejecting the petition the Court held that\u00a0 gist of reasons recorded in both sets of communications sent to assessee were same\u00a0 and Joint Commissioner perused such reasons and forwarded same to Principal Commissioner with his own remarks and thereupon Principal Commissioner also put his endorsement that it was a fit case for re-opening of assessment.\u00a0 Mere fact that tax\u00a0 authorities conveyed reason twice would not be fatal and thus, validity of reassessment proceedings deserved to be upheld. (AY. 2011-12)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 147 : Reassessment\u2013Two set of reasons\u2013Gist of reasons  same\u2013Sanction was obtained\u2013Mere fact that tax  authorities conveyed reason twice would not be fatal -Reassessment is held to be valid. [S.143(1), 148]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-4851","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-digest"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-1gf","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4851","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=4851"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4851\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":6467,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/4851\/revisions\/6467"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=4851"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=4851"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=4851"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}