{"id":49342,"date":"2024-12-28T12:16:01","date_gmt":"2024-12-28T06:46:01","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/praveen-sanjiv-v-ito-2024-300-taxman-33-mad-hc\/"},"modified":"2025-10-13T11:22:12","modified_gmt":"2025-10-13T05:52:12","slug":"praveen-sanjiv-v-ito-2024-300-taxman-33-mad-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/praveen-sanjiv-v-ito-2024-300-taxman-33-mad-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Praveen Sanjiv v. ITO (2024) 300 Taxman 33\/ (2025) 477 ITR 370    (Mad.)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Reassessment notice under section. 148 is initiated against the assessee. Proceedings under section 148 were initiated against\u00a0 the assessee in respect of two alleged purchases of immovable property. Assessment order is\u00a0 passed making addition to income of assessee. On writ the Court held that\u00a0 the\u00a0 assessee had placed on record reply to show cause notice cum draft assessment order and produced list of attachments thereto including I.T. acknowledgment of assessee&#8217;s mother and father, documents pertaining to sources of income and bank statements.\u00a0 Assessee had previously enclosed all documents pertaining to purchase of relevant immovable property and construction undertaken thereon. Court held that assessee having submitted a reply along with relevant documents, non consideration thereof violated principles of natural justice\u00a0 assessment order is unsustainable. Accordingly the\u00a0 assessment order is\u00a0 set aside and matter is\u00a0 remanded for reconsideration from stage of reply to show cause notice cum draft assessment order. \u00a0(AY. 2015-16)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Unexplained investments-Violation of principle of natural justice-Order passed without considering the documents submitted by the assessee-Assessment order  is set aside  and matter is  remanded for reconsideration from stage of reply to show cause notice cum draft assessment order.[S. 69, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49342","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-cPQ","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49342","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49342"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49342\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57197,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49342\/revisions\/57197"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49342"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49342"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49342"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}