{"id":49389,"date":"2024-12-28T12:41:17","date_gmt":"2024-12-28T07:11:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/cit-karnataka-v-mukhtar-minerals-p-ltd-2021-276-taxman-218-432-itr-152-bom-hc\/"},"modified":"2024-12-28T12:41:17","modified_gmt":"2024-12-28T07:11:17","slug":"cit-karnataka-v-mukhtar-minerals-p-ltd-2021-276-taxman-218-432-itr-152-bom-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/cit-karnataka-v-mukhtar-minerals-p-ltd-2021-276-taxman-218-432-itr-152-bom-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"CIT, Karnataka v. Mukhtar Minerals (P.) Ltd.[2021] 276 Taxman 218\/ 432 ITR 152 (Bom)( HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Assessee company \u00a0claimed deduction in respect of payments made by it to mining lessees . \u00a0It claimed that same is \u00a0towards expenditure undertaken by said lessees for purpose of developments like roads and trenches, temporary huts, drilling, etc. \u00a0AO \u00a0held that said amount was paid by assessee for obtaining right to mine, thus, same could not be allowed as revenue expenditure . CIT(A) allowed the claim , which is affirmed by Tribunal . On appeal the Court held that \u00a0material on record clearly indicated that amount paid by assessee to mining lessees was not towards acquisition of right to mine but was towards expenditure undertaken by said lessees for purpose of developments like roads and trenches, temporary huts, drilling, etc. \u00a0. Order of Tribunal allowing the deduction is affirmed . \u00a0(AY. 2008 -09)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 35E : Deduction for expenditure on prospecting etc. for certain  minerals- Capital or revenue &#8211;  Amount paid to mining lessees is not towards acquisition of right to mine but was towards expenditure undertaken by said lessees for purpose of developments like roads and trenches, temporary huts, drilling, etc.- Allowable as deduction. [ S. 37(1)]  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49389","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-cQB","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49389","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49389"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49389\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":49390,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49389\/revisions\/49390"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49389"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49389"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49389"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}