{"id":49428,"date":"2024-12-28T19:04:28","date_gmt":"2024-12-28T13:34:28","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/desert-infraspace-p-ltd-v-ito-2024-300-taxman-406-guj-hc\/"},"modified":"2025-12-24T06:50:24","modified_gmt":"2025-12-24T01:20:24","slug":"desert-infraspace-p-ltd-v-ito-2024-300-taxman-406-guj-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/desert-infraspace-p-ltd-v-ito-2024-300-taxman-406-guj-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Desert Infraspace (P.) Ltd. v. ITO (2024) 300 Taxman 406\/(2025) 478 ITR 428   (Guj.)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Assessing Officer passed assessment order under\u00a0 making addition under section 68 of the Act. Addition is affirmed by the CIT(A). On appeal before the Tribunal the assessee\u00a0 engaged a Chartered Accountant to contest and to make effective representation before Tribunal.\u00a0 However, said Chartered Accountant remained negligent towards his statutory rights of appeal and case of assessee could not be represented effectively. Consequently the\u00a0 appeal was dismissed ex parte by Tribunal. On appeal the Court held that\u00a0 since negligence was not attributable to assessee, another opportunity of hearing\u00a0 is granted and the\u00a0 matter is\u00a0 restored before Tribunal. However the assessee is\u00a0 Directed to deposit cost of Rs 25000\u00a0 before the Tribunal. (AY. 2012-13)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 254(1) : Appellate Tribunal-Powers-Ex parte order by the Tribunal-Un explained cash credits-Negligent of the Chartered Accountant  to make effective representation before the Tribunal-Negligence was not attributable to assessee,-Matter is restored before Tribunal  to give an opportunity of hearing-Directed to deposit cost of Rs 25000  before the Tribunal.[S. 68, 260A]   <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-49428","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-cRe","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49428","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=49428"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49428\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":57693,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/49428\/revisions\/57693"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=49428"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=49428"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=49428"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}