{"id":50054,"date":"2025-01-16T20:41:27","date_gmt":"2025-01-16T15:11:27","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/bhavesh-commotrade-p-ltd-v-dy-cit-2024-110-itr-180-ranchitrib-acit-v-suresh-kumar-agarwal-2024-110-itr-180-ranchitrib-2\/"},"modified":"2025-05-07T13:00:31","modified_gmt":"2025-05-07T07:30:31","slug":"bhavesh-commotrade-p-ltd-v-dy-cit-2024-110-itr-180-ranchitrib-acit-v-suresh-kumar-agarwal-2024-110-itr-180-ranchitrib-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/bhavesh-commotrade-p-ltd-v-dy-cit-2024-110-itr-180-ranchitrib-acit-v-suresh-kumar-agarwal-2024-110-itr-180-ranchitrib-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Bhavesh Commotrade P. Ltd. v Dy. CIT (2024) 110 ITR 180 \/231 TTJ  641  (Ranchi)(Trib) ACIT v. Suresh Kumar Agarwal (2024)) 110 ITR 180\/231 TTJ  641   (Ranchi)(Trib)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Held that the additions made in the hands of the beneficiary company in various assessment years were on substantive basis, as affirmed by the Commissioner (Appeals) whereas the additions made on the assessee-company were on protective basis, and were deleted on the ground that the substantive additions were sustained. Accordingly, the addition made on protective basis in the hands of Suresh Kumar Agarwal\u00a0 could also not be sustained. The Assessing Officer was directed to delete the addition.(AY. 2011-12 to 2014-15)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 143(3) : Assessment-Protective assessment-Lack of confirmation from parties sourcing funds for land purchase-Subsequent substantive assessment in hands of  payers becoming final-Addition of  same amount in hands of  assessee  is invalid.[S.69C, 153A]  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-50054","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-d1k","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50054","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50054"}],"version-history":[{"count":2,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50054\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":53692,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50054\/revisions\/53692"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50054"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50054"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50054"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}