{"id":50377,"date":"2025-01-28T15:47:10","date_gmt":"2025-01-28T10:17:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pioneer-carbon-co-pvt-ltd-bhilai-v-ito-2024-111-itr-409-raipurtrib\/"},"modified":"2025-01-28T15:47:10","modified_gmt":"2025-01-28T10:17:10","slug":"pioneer-carbon-co-pvt-ltd-bhilai-v-ito-2024-111-itr-409-raipurtrib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pioneer-carbon-co-pvt-ltd-bhilai-v-ito-2024-111-itr-409-raipurtrib\/","title":{"rendered":"Pioneer Carbon Co Pvt. Ltd. Bhilai v. ITO, (2024) 111 ITR 409 (Raipur)(Trib.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The Hon\u2019ble Tribunal ruled in favor of the assessee, quashing the reassessment orders for both assessment years in question.\u00a0 The Hon\u2019ble Tribunal held that since no addition was made on the primary ground for which the reassessment was initiated, the A.O.\u00a0 lacked jurisdiction to make independent additions. The Hon\u2019ble Tribunal relied on judicial precedents, including the case of CIT v. Jet Airways (I) Ltd(2011) 331 ITR 326 (Bom)(HC) \u00a0and directed deletion of all independent additions made by the AO. Tribunal also held that\u00a0 the AO has\u00a0\u00a0 not obtained\u00a0 approval for converting limited scrutiny in to complete scrutiny hence the order is not valid. \u00a0(AY. 2013-14, 2015-16)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 147 : Reassessment-No addition is made on the basis of recorded reasons-Reassessment is bad in law-The AO lacks jurisdiction to make independent addition-Limited scrutiny-Not obtaining approval for converting limited scrutiny in to complete scrutiny-Order is not valid. [S. 2(22)(e), 143(3), 148]  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-50377","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-d6x","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50377","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50377"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50377\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":50378,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50377\/revisions\/50378"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50377"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50377"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50377"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}