{"id":50582,"date":"2025-02-03T19:25:53","date_gmt":"2025-02-03T13:55:53","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/kailash-gahlot-v-dcit-2024-208-itd-25-113-itr-62-sn-delhi-trib\/"},"modified":"2025-02-03T19:25:53","modified_gmt":"2025-02-03T13:55:53","slug":"kailash-gahlot-v-dcit-2024-208-itd-25-113-itr-62-sn-delhi-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/kailash-gahlot-v-dcit-2024-208-itd-25-113-itr-62-sn-delhi-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"Kailash Gahlot. v. DCIT (2024) 208 ITD 25 \/113 ITR 62 (SN) (Delhi) (Trib.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>During\u00a0 search, a diary was seized from office of assessee which contained entries of substantial amount of cash expenses. Assessee was requested to provide explanation with respect to cash expenses during year under consideration. The assessee has filed the affidavit of Mr. Rohit Sharma\u00a0 who affirmed that the diary is belong to him and\u00a0 written by him. The\u00a0 Assessing Officer\u00a0 held that\u00a0 the amount of cash expenses was unexplained and made addition u\/s 69C of the Act. CIT(A) affirmed the addition. On appeal the Tribunal held that\u00a0\u00a0 contents of affidavit did not properly explain entries as names of person paying amount and expenses paid were vaguely mentioned, names of relatives of assessee were also mentioned.\u00a0 In absence of specific details and other supporting documents, affidavit of Rohit Sharma is\u00a0 rejected and addition is affirmed. (AY. 2015-16)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Diary-Cash expenses-Absence of specific details in the affidavit-Addition is affirmed. [S. 132] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-50582","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-d9Q","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50582","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=50582"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50582\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":50583,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/50582\/revisions\/50583"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=50582"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=50582"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=50582"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}