{"id":52092,"date":"2025-03-18T14:07:50","date_gmt":"2025-03-18T08:37:50","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/rahul-agarwal-v-dy-cit-it-2024114-itr-67-snbangtrib-2\/"},"modified":"2025-03-18T14:07:50","modified_gmt":"2025-03-18T08:37:50","slug":"rahul-agarwal-v-dy-cit-it-2024114-itr-67-snbangtrib-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/rahul-agarwal-v-dy-cit-it-2024114-itr-67-snbangtrib-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Rahul Agarwal v. Dy. CIT (IT) (2024)114 ITR 67 (SN)(Bang)(Trib)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Held, that it was well-settled that the law applicable for the relevant assessment year should be seen. Relied on Shree Choudhary Transport Co. v. ITO(2020) 426 ITR 289(SC) \u00a0\u00a0\u00a0During the remand proceedings, the Assessing Officer, after examining the passport, had observed that for the impugned assessment year, the assessee was a resident. However, the Revenue authorities had considered the assessee\u2019s residential status on the date of issuance of notice under section\u00a0148\u00a0to be non-resident, which was not correct, and that the entire proceedings in the status of a non-resident is\u00a0 not sustainable in the eyes of law hence\u00a0 quashed.(AY.2016-17)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 147 : Reassessment-Residential status-Fictitious loss-Reassessment notice on the assumption as resident-Reopening Based on receipt of information of escapement of income-Assuming as non-resident-Proceedings in status of Non-resident is bad in law-In Income-tax matters, the law to be applied is the law in force for the relevant assessment year unless otherwise stated or implied. [S. 133A, 143(3) 144C(15(b)(ii) 148] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-52092","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-dyc","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52092","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=52092"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52092\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":52093,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52092\/revisions\/52093"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52092"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=52092"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=52092"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}