{"id":52320,"date":"2025-03-24T12:38:57","date_gmt":"2025-03-24T07:08:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/venkateswar-medicare-p-ltd-v-ito-2024115-itr-325-231-ttj-791-169-taxmann-com-460-koltrib-2\/"},"modified":"2025-03-24T12:38:57","modified_gmt":"2025-03-24T07:08:57","slug":"venkateswar-medicare-p-ltd-v-ito-2024115-itr-325-231-ttj-791-169-taxmann-com-460-koltrib-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/venkateswar-medicare-p-ltd-v-ito-2024115-itr-325-231-ttj-791-169-taxmann-com-460-koltrib-2\/","title":{"rendered":"Venkateswar Medicare P. Ltd. v. ITO (2024)115 ITR 325 \/231 TTJ 791 \/ 169 taxmann.com 460 (Kol)(Trib)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Held that\u00a0 the notice issued under section\u00a0148\u00a0is\u00a0 issued after March 31, 2021, under the new regime of reassessment, which is\u00a0 barred by limitation. Hence\u00a0 all subsequent proceedings on the basis of the notices, being not sustainable in law. Order is quashed. According to the assessee, per its books of account, there is no transactions with the four parties mentioned in the reasons recorded by the Assessing Officer. There is\u00a0 only one transaction with each of these parties of taking a short-term loan, which was repaid in about two years.\u00a0 The notice issued by the Assessing Officer under section\u00a0148A(b)\u00a0had been comprehensively replied to controverting the allegations as incorrect and baseless. Assessment is quashed.\u00a0 (AY. 2014-15, 2016-17)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 148A : Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Limitation&#8211;Notice issued on 30-6-2021 will not  relate back to original date where limitation expired on 31-3-2021-Notice is barred by  limitation-Order and consequential notice  is set aside-Information from Investigation wing-Accommodation entries-Charges are  incorrect-Assessment made without application of mind-Notice and order is quashed.   [S. 147, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d)]  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-52320","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-dBS","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52320","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=52320"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52320\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":52321,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52320\/revisions\/52321"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52320"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=52320"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=52320"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}