{"id":52860,"date":"2025-04-15T21:08:25","date_gmt":"2025-04-15T15:38:25","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pcit-v-hellmann-worldwide-logistics-india-p-ltd-2024-470-itr-97-155-taxmann-com-44-delhi-hc\/"},"modified":"2025-04-15T21:08:25","modified_gmt":"2025-04-15T15:38:25","slug":"pcit-v-hellmann-worldwide-logistics-india-p-ltd-2024-470-itr-97-155-taxmann-com-44-delhi-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pcit-v-hellmann-worldwide-logistics-india-p-ltd-2024-470-itr-97-155-taxmann-com-44-delhi-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"PCIT v. Hellmann Worldwide Logistics India (P.) Ltd. (2024) 470 ITR 97 \/ 155 taxmann.com 44 (Delhi) (HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dismissing the appeal of the Revenue the Court held that the Tribunal has directed the\u00a0 assessee to carry out internal FAR analysis and identify proper revenue and costs vis-a-vis audited accounts to establish internal comparability under TNMM as most appropriate method (MAM). Direction of Tribunal is affirmed. Court also observed that the\u00a0 appellate\u00a0 authorities are not precluded from adopting a method different from that adopted by the assessee in the transfer pricing report. \u00a0(AY. 2008-09)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm\u2019s length price-Avoidance of tax-<br \/>\nInternational transaction-Methods for determination of most appropriate method-Internal TNMM and not CUP method-Appellate  authorities are not precluded from adopting a method different from that adopted by the assessee in the transfer pricing report-Order of Tribunal is affirmed-No substantial question of law.  [S.260A]  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-52860","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-dKA","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52860","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=52860"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52860\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":52861,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52860\/revisions\/52861"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52860"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=52860"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=52860"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}