{"id":52912,"date":"2025-04-15T21:41:40","date_gmt":"2025-04-15T16:11:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/cit-v-goldstone-cements-ltd-2024-470-itr-749-156-taxmann-com-529-gauhati-hc\/"},"modified":"2025-04-15T21:41:40","modified_gmt":"2025-04-15T16:11:40","slug":"cit-v-goldstone-cements-ltd-2024-470-itr-749-156-taxmann-com-529-gauhati-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/cit-v-goldstone-cements-ltd-2024-470-itr-749-156-taxmann-com-529-gauhati-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"CIT v. Goldstone Cements Ltd. (2024) 470 ITR 749 \/156 taxmann.com 529 (Gauhati) (HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dismissing the appeal of the Revenue the Court held that shareholding pattern document prepared by way of secretarial compliance report, which was filed along with company&#8217;s annual return in Form MGT-7 with ROC and was therefore available in public domain. GCL-HD-1, collected by jurisdictional authority during search carried out in premises of assessee in year 2017 did not constitute incriminating material so as to justify reopening of assessment of unabated\/completed assessments under section 153A, thus, addition to income of assessee under section 68 of the Act is rightly deleted by the Tribunal. No substantial question of law. (AY. 2011-12 to 2015-16, 2017-18)\u00a0<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 153A : Assessment-Search-Cash credits-Incriminating document-Document of  shareholding pattern document prepared by way of secretarial compliance report, which was filed along with company&#8217;s annual return in Form MGT-7 with ROC-Available in public domain-Would not constitute incriminating document to justify reopening of assessment of unabated\/completed-No substantial question of law. [S. 132, 260A] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-52912","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-dLq","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52912","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=52912"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52912\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":52913,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/52912\/revisions\/52913"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=52912"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=52912"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=52912"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}