{"id":54155,"date":"2025-05-13T15:13:13","date_gmt":"2025-05-13T09:43:13","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/city-corporation-limited-v-acit-2025-171-taxmann-com-301-bom-hc-2\/"},"modified":"2025-05-13T15:13:13","modified_gmt":"2025-05-13T09:43:13","slug":"city-corporation-limited-v-acit-2025-171-taxmann-com-301-bom-hc-2","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/city-corporation-limited-v-acit-2025-171-taxmann-com-301-bom-hc-2\/","title":{"rendered":"City Corporation Limited v. ACIT (2025) 171 taxmann.com 301 (Bom) (HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On writ the Court held that based on the\u00a0 averments and the arguments, the fundamental error in issuing the impugned notices against a non-existing company despite full knowledge of the merger cannot be condone. The impugned notices, which are non-est cannot be treated as \u201cgood\u201d as urged on behalf of the Respondents. In PCIT v. Maruti Suzuki Ltd (2019) 265 Taxman 515\/ 416 ITR 613 (SC)<\/p>\n<p>, the Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court has held that issuing notice in the name of a non-existing company is a substantive illegality and not a mere procedural violation of the nature adverted to in Section 292B of the Act.\u00a0 Notice and order is quashed and set aside. (AY. 2013-14 to 2019-20)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 148 : Reassessment-Notice-Merger-Non Existing entity-Notice issued to a non-existing entity post-merger was a substantive illegality and not some procedural violation-Notice and order is quashed and set aside. [S.147,  292B, Art. 226]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54155","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-e5t","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54155","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54155"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54155\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":54156,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54155\/revisions\/54156"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54155"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54155"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54155"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}