{"id":54187,"date":"2025-05-13T15:23:14","date_gmt":"2025-05-13T09:53:14","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/international-hospital-ltd-v-dcit-2024-167-taxmann-com-317-2025-472-itr-400-delhihc-6\/"},"modified":"2025-05-13T15:23:14","modified_gmt":"2025-05-13T09:53:14","slug":"international-hospital-ltd-v-dcit-2024-167-taxmann-com-317-2025-472-itr-400-delhihc-6","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/international-hospital-ltd-v-dcit-2024-167-taxmann-com-317-2025-472-itr-400-delhihc-6\/","title":{"rendered":"International Hospital Ltd. v. DCIT (2024) 167 taxmann.com 317 \/(2025) 472 ITR 400 (Delhi)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>AO passed an assessment order in the name of the Company already merged with another company pursuant to a scheme of arrangement sanctioned by the High Court.\u00a0 AO initiated proceedings u\/s 154 during pendency of appeal before CIT (Appeals).<\/p>\n<p>On appeal, the Hon\u2019ble Court observed that the factum of merger was already within the knowledge of AO, even then the AO passed the order in the name of entity which had ceased to exist.\u00a0 Accordingly, the Hon\u2019ble Court held that there is no case of inadvertent error or mistake and therefore, rectification order passed three years after framing of the original assessment order even during the pendency of the appeal of the assessee, the rectification order was unsustainable.(AY. 2013-14)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 154 : Rectification of mistake-Mistake apparent from the record-Since rectification order was passed three years after framing of original order of assessment,-Pendency of appeal-Rectification order is quashed. [S. 147, 148,292B,  Art. 226] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54187","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-e5Z","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54187","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54187"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54187\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":54188,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54187\/revisions\/54188"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54187"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54187"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54187"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}