{"id":54815,"date":"2025-06-11T12:40:15","date_gmt":"2025-06-11T07:10:15","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pcit-v-burberry-india-p-ltd-2025-302-taxman-257-delhihc\/"},"modified":"2025-06-11T12:40:15","modified_gmt":"2025-06-11T07:10:15","slug":"pcit-v-burberry-india-p-ltd-2025-302-taxman-257-delhihc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pcit-v-burberry-india-p-ltd-2025-302-taxman-257-delhihc\/","title":{"rendered":"PCIT v. Burberry India (P.) Ltd. (2025) 302 Taxman 257 (Delhi)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Assessee is\u00a0 engaged in trading of imported luxury goods.\u00a0 It had used RPM as corroborative method for benchmarking international transactions relating to import of finished goods. TPO rejected RPM for reason that assessee had incurred excessive sum towards AMP expenses and adopted TNMM as most appropriate method and made addition.\u00a0 Tribunal accepted assessee\u2019s contention that its AMP expenses were not excessive and were similar to those incurred by other comparable entities and held that RPM would be most appropriate method in given facts. High Court affirmed the order of the Tribunal. (AY. 2012-13, 2013-14)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm\u2019s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Trading of imported luxury goods-Resale price method (RPM)  is  most appropriate method. [S. 260A] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-54815","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-eg7","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54815","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=54815"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54815\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":54816,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/54815\/revisions\/54816"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=54815"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=54815"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=54815"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}