{"id":56112,"date":"2025-08-18T18:29:04","date_gmt":"2025-08-18T12:59:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pcit-v-mangalore-refinery-petrochemicals-ltd-2025-343-ctr-153-246-dtr-121-171-taxmann-com-622-karnhc\/"},"modified":"2025-08-18T18:29:04","modified_gmt":"2025-08-18T12:59:04","slug":"pcit-v-mangalore-refinery-petrochemicals-ltd-2025-343-ctr-153-246-dtr-121-171-taxmann-com-622-karnhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pcit-v-mangalore-refinery-petrochemicals-ltd-2025-343-ctr-153-246-dtr-121-171-taxmann-com-622-karnhc\/","title":{"rendered":"PCIT v. Mangalore Refinery &#038; Petrochemicals Ltd. (2025) 343 CTR 153 \/ 246 DTR 121 \/ 171 taxmann.com 622 (Karn)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>For AY 2009-10, additions were made including disallowance of freight charges. CIT(A) partly allowed relief based on DTAA; ITAT confirmed in assessee\u2019s favour. Revenue filed appeal before High Court. Meanwhile, assessee opted under DTVSV Act, 2020. PCIT issued Form-3 demanding full disputed tax instead of 50%. On writ the Court\u00a0 held that under S. 2(j) and s. 3(1) proviso, only 50% of disputed tax is payable when appeal is in Revenue\u2019s favour. Higher demand by the Department was contrary to the scheme and therefore illegal. Fresh Form-3 was directed to be issued.(AY. 2009-10)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p> Direct Tax Vivad Se Vishwas Act, 2020.<br \/>\nS. 2(j): Disputed tax-Only 50% payable where appeal is decided in Revenue\u2019s favour-Higher demand illegal-Fresh Form-3 was directed to be issued.  [S. 3(1), Art. 226]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56112","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-eB2","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56112","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=56112"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56112\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":56113,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56112\/revisions\/56113"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=56112"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=56112"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=56112"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}