{"id":56188,"date":"2025-08-22T10:36:17","date_gmt":"2025-08-22T05:06:17","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/dcit-v-chaitanya-properties-p-ltd-2025-212-itd-150-bang-trib\/"},"modified":"2025-08-22T10:36:17","modified_gmt":"2025-08-22T05:06:17","slug":"dcit-v-chaitanya-properties-p-ltd-2025-212-itd-150-bang-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/dcit-v-chaitanya-properties-p-ltd-2025-212-itd-150-bang-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"DCIT v. Chaitanya Properties (P.) Ltd. (2025) 212 ITD 150 (Bang) (Trib.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Assessee, engaged in property development, had filed its return of income declaring a business loss. Pursuant to a search conducted in case of a Trust, revealing a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) between assessee and Prestige Estate, Assessing Officer had made substantial additions, including Rs. 325.32 crores as business income, Rs. 84.92 crores as short-term capital gains, Rs. 71.90 crores as long-term capital gains. CIT(A) deleted the addition. On appeal the Tribunal held that issue of capital gains arising from transfer of capital assets into stock-in-trade for JDA, as well as business income, had already attained finality through Tribunal&#8217;s order in first round of litigation holding that income from JDA would be taxable only from assessment year 2012-13 since sale deeds had commenced that year and taxing same in assessment year 2011-12 would result in double taxation.\u00a0 Order of CIT (A) is affirmed. (AY. 2011-12)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 28(i) : Business income-Joint development agreement-Transfer of capital asset into stock-in-trade-Capital gains-Double taxation-Taxable in the year 2012-13.[S. 45(2)] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56188","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-eCg","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56188","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=56188"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56188\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":56189,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56188\/revisions\/56189"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=56188"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=56188"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=56188"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}