{"id":56244,"date":"2025-08-22T11:05:10","date_gmt":"2025-08-22T05:35:10","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/shree-mahavideh-charitable-trust-v-cit-e-2025-212-itd-587-surat-trib\/"},"modified":"2025-08-22T11:05:10","modified_gmt":"2025-08-22T05:35:10","slug":"shree-mahavideh-charitable-trust-v-cit-e-2025-212-itd-587-surat-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/shree-mahavideh-charitable-trust-v-cit-e-2025-212-itd-587-surat-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"Shree Mahavideh Charitable Trust. v. CIT (E) (2025) 212 ITD 587 (Surat) (Trib)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Assessee-trust\u00a0filed an application for registration under section 80G. Commissioner (E) rejected same on ground that some objects of assessee-trust\u00a0were religious in nature, hence, assessee-trust\u00a0was not established only for\u00a0charitable\u00a0purposes. On appeal the Tribunal held that\u00a0 since assessee-trust\u00a0had not incurred any expenditure which was of religious nature, mere use of words &#8216;religious&#8217; or &#8216;religion&#8217; in few objects of\u00a0trust\u00a0deed would not mean that\u00a0trust\u00a0was not for\u00a0charitable\u00a0purpose but was for religious purpose. Matter was remanded back to Commissioner (E) to carry out verification as to whether 5 per cent of total income of assessee-trust\u00a0was spent for religious purpose and thereafter to consider grant of registration in accordance with law.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 80G : Donation-Some objects were religious in nature-Not incurred any expenditure which was of religious nature-Mere use of words &#8216;religious&#8217; or &#8216;religion&#8217; in few objects of trust deed would not mean that trust was not for charitable purpose but was for religious purpose. [S.80G (5), Form No 10AB]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56244","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-eDa","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56244","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=56244"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56244\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":56245,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56244\/revisions\/56245"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=56244"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=56244"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=56244"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}