{"id":56262,"date":"2025-08-22T11:08:11","date_gmt":"2025-08-22T05:38:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/angamaly-service-co-operative-bank-ltd-v-ito-2025-212-itd-288-cochin-trib\/"},"modified":"2025-08-22T11:08:11","modified_gmt":"2025-08-22T05:38:11","slug":"angamaly-service-co-operative-bank-ltd-v-ito-2025-212-itd-288-cochin-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/angamaly-service-co-operative-bank-ltd-v-ito-2025-212-itd-288-cochin-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"Angamaly Service Co-operative Bank Ltd. v. ITO (2025) 212 ITD 288 (Cochin) (Trib.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Assessee, co-operative society, could not file return within due date-Assessing Officer issued reopening notice. the Assessing Officer disallowed the\u00a0 deduction on ground that assessee did not file return within due date specified in section 139(1).CIT(A) has up held the order of the Assessing Officer. On appeal the\u00a0 Tribunal held that\u00a0 the\u00a0\u00a0 assessee had filed a condonation petition before Principal Commissioner who condoned delay in filing return for assessment year 2019-20 beyond due date specified under section 139(1).\u00a0 Accordingly the\u00a0 issue was to be remitted to Assessing Officer with a direction to give effect of order of Principal Commissioner and pass necessary order after due verification allowing deduction as claimed by assessee under section 80P. (AY. 2009-10)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 80P : Co-operative societies-Return was not filed within due date-PCIT condoned the delay-issue was to be remitted to Assessing Officer.[S.80AC, 119, 139(1)]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56262","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-eDs","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56262","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=56262"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56262\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":56263,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56262\/revisions\/56263"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=56262"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=56262"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=56262"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}