{"id":565,"date":"2018-04-30T10:13:03","date_gmt":"2018-04-30T10:13:03","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/cgt-v-jindal-equipment-leasing-2018-402-itr-184-delhi-hc-cgt-v-stainless-investments-ltd-2018-402-itr-184-delhi-hc-cit-v-mansarover-investment-ltd-2018-402-itr-184-delhi-hc\/"},"modified":"2018-04-30T10:13:03","modified_gmt":"2018-04-30T10:13:03","slug":"cgt-v-jindal-equipment-leasing-2018-402-itr-184-delhi-hc-cgt-v-stainless-investments-ltd-2018-402-itr-184-delhi-hc-cit-v-mansarover-investment-ltd-2018-402-itr-184-delhi-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/cgt-v-jindal-equipment-leasing-2018-402-itr-184-delhi-hc-cgt-v-stainless-investments-ltd-2018-402-itr-184-delhi-hc-cit-v-mansarover-investment-ltd-2018-402-itr-184-delhi-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"CGT  v. Jindal Equipment Leasing. (2018) 402 ITR 184 (Delhi) (HC) CGT v. Stainless Investments Ltd (2018) 402 ITR 184 (Delhi) (HC)  CIT v. Mansarover Investment Ltd (2018) 402 ITR 184 (Delhi) (HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Allowing the  appeals of the revenue the  Court held that, in income tax proceedings the Court  had reversed the Appellate Tribunal\u2019s findings and held that the characteristic of the sale proceeds as a capital loss was sham and brought the amounts into question to tax \u2013 either as business receipts or as business losses. Such being the case, a like treatment had to be given in the gift-tax proceedings. The Tribunal had considered only the validity of the proceedings, but had not considered whether the transactions under S. 4(1)(a) amounted to deemed gift. No conclusive finding in that regard was rendered, nor any finding could have been rendered or was given. The orders of the Tribunal were set aside. Matter remanded.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Gift Tax Act, 1958<br \/>\nS. 16: Reassessment-Deemed Gift \u2014No conclusive finding rendered by Appellate Tribunal on question of notional or deemed gift \u2014 Order  was set aside [ S. 4(1)(a) ]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-565","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-digest"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-97","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/565","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=565"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/565\/revisions"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=565"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=565"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=565"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}