{"id":56703,"date":"2025-09-20T10:50:55","date_gmt":"2025-09-20T05:20:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/yes-bank-ltd-v-acit-2024-160-taxmann-com-329-2025-474-itr-430-bom-hc-editorial-slp-of-revenue-dismissed-for-delay-162-days-and-on-merits-acit-v-yes-bank-ltd-2025-303-taxman-260-sc\/"},"modified":"2025-09-20T10:50:55","modified_gmt":"2025-09-20T05:20:55","slug":"yes-bank-ltd-v-acit-2024-160-taxmann-com-329-2025-474-itr-430-bom-hc-editorial-slp-of-revenue-dismissed-for-delay-162-days-and-on-merits-acit-v-yes-bank-ltd-2025-303-taxman-260-sc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/yes-bank-ltd-v-acit-2024-160-taxmann-com-329-2025-474-itr-430-bom-hc-editorial-slp-of-revenue-dismissed-for-delay-162-days-and-on-merits-acit-v-yes-bank-ltd-2025-303-taxman-260-sc\/","title":{"rendered":"Yes Bank Ltd. v. ACIT [2024] 160 Taxmann.com 329 \/ (2025) 474 ITR 430 (Bom) (HC) Editorial: SLP of Revenue dismissed for delay (162 days) and on merits ACIT v. Yes Bank Ltd., (2025) 303 Taxman 260 (SC)."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>During assessment, the AO raised a query regarding deduction under S.36(1)(viia). The assessee replied and furnished details. The assessment accepted the position. Subsequently, a notice under s.148 was issued to withdraw the deduction. The Court held that once a query is raised and responded to in the assessment proceedings, the matter becomes part of the AO\u2019s consideration. A mere change of opinion does not constitute a reason to believe that income has escaped assessment. Reopening on the same facts without fresh material is unjustified, and the notice under s.148 was invalid. (AY. 2010-11)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 147 : Reassessment-Query raised during assessment proceedings-Change of opinion-Reopening not justified.  [S. 36(1)(viia), 148, 149, Art. 226]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-56703","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-eKz","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56703","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=56703"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56703\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":56704,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/56703\/revisions\/56704"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=56703"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=56703"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=56703"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}