{"id":58299,"date":"2026-01-10T10:32:19","date_gmt":"2026-01-10T05:02:19","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/ram-baburao-salve-v-assessing-officer-2024-162-taxmann-com-354-bom-hc\/"},"modified":"2026-01-10T10:32:19","modified_gmt":"2026-01-10T05:02:19","slug":"ram-baburao-salve-v-assessing-officer-2024-162-taxmann-com-354-bom-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/ram-baburao-salve-v-assessing-officer-2024-162-taxmann-com-354-bom-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Ram Baburao Salve v. Assessing Officer [2024] 162 taxmann.com 354 (Bom.)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The High Court upheld the order of the Tribunal which had rejected a Miscellaneous Application filed with an inordinate delay of 1279 days. The Court affirmed that the Tribunal has no power under section 254(2) of the Income-tax Act, 1961 to condone any delay beyond the statutory period of six months prescribed for filing a rectification application. As neither section 254 nor any other provision of the Act confers such a power of condonation on the Tribunal, its dismissal of the time-barred application was held to be legally correct.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 254(2): Appellate Tribunal-Rectification of mistake apparent from the record-Condonation of delay of 1279 days-Tribunal has no power to condone delay beyond statutory period-Order of Tribunal affirmed. [S. 254(1), Art. 226] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-58299","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-faj","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58299","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58299"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58299\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":58300,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58299\/revisions\/58300"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58299"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58299"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58299"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}