{"id":58509,"date":"2026-02-16T12:27:57","date_gmt":"2026-02-16T06:57:57","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/sulochana-v-gupta-v-ito-2025-344-ctr-405-249-dtr-1-174-taxmann-com-1201-gujhc\/"},"modified":"2026-02-16T12:27:57","modified_gmt":"2026-02-16T06:57:57","slug":"sulochana-v-gupta-v-ito-2025-344-ctr-405-249-dtr-1-174-taxmann-com-1201-gujhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/sulochana-v-gupta-v-ito-2025-344-ctr-405-249-dtr-1-174-taxmann-com-1201-gujhc\/","title":{"rendered":"Sulochana V. Gupta v. ITO (2025) 344 CTR 405 \/ 249 DTR 1 \/ 174 taxmann.com 1201 (Guj)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>On appeal the\u00a0 High Court held that the Tribunal was not justified in invoking S. 64(1A) to hold that the income (or loss) of a minor child can only be clubbed in the hands of the father and not in the hands of the mother. The Court noted that in the immediately preceding assessment year, the minor son\u2019s income had in fact been clubbed in the hands of the assessee mother and such treatment was never disturbed by the authorities. Further, the issue of clubbing was not even considered by the Assessing Officer at the assessment stage for the year under consideration. In these circumstances, a strict interpretation of s. 64(1A) would require that the minor\u2019s income\/loss be clubbed in the hands of the parent in whose income it was included earlier, and the Tribunal erred in law in directing that it must necessarily be clubbed only in the father\u2019s hands. Accordingly, the Tribunal\u2019s order was set aside. (AY.1997-98)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 64 : Clubbing of income-Minor child-Income includes loss-Loss of minor can be clubbed in mother\u2019s hands and not necessarily only in father\u2019s hands-Order of Tribunal set aside. [S.64(IA), 260A] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-58509","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-fdH","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58509","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=58509"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58509\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":58510,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/58509\/revisions\/58510"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=58509"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=58509"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=58509"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}