{"id":59019,"date":"2026-03-25T12:49:02","date_gmt":"2026-03-25T07:19:02","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pcit-v-zahira-r-khatun-2025-304-taxman-514-sc-editorial-pcit-v-dhondiram-narayan-limbhore-2023-153-taxmann-com-539-bomhc\/"},"modified":"2026-03-25T12:49:02","modified_gmt":"2026-03-25T07:19:02","slug":"pcit-v-zahira-r-khatun-2025-304-taxman-514-sc-editorial-pcit-v-dhondiram-narayan-limbhore-2023-153-taxmann-com-539-bomhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pcit-v-zahira-r-khatun-2025-304-taxman-514-sc-editorial-pcit-v-dhondiram-narayan-limbhore-2023-153-taxmann-com-539-bomhc\/","title":{"rendered":"PCIT v. Zahira R. Khatun (2025) 304 Taxman 514 (SC) Editorial : PCIT v. Dhondiram Narayan Limbhore (2023) 153 taxmann.com 539 (Bom)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Assessing Officer added\u00a0 certain purchases made by assessee were bogus. He,\u00a0 added said amount to assessee&#8217;s taxable income. Tribunal deleted the addition.\u00a0 On appeal the Court\u00a0 following the ratio in Pr. CIT\u00a0v.\u00a0Mohommad Haji Adam &amp; Co. (2019) 103 taxmann.com 459 (Bom)(HC) held that where there was no discrepancy between purchases shown by assessee and sales declared, entire amount of bogus purchases could not be treated as income of assessee and addition was to be limited to extent of bringing gross profit rate on purchases at same rate as applied in other genuine purchases. \u00a0SLP filed against order of High Court was\u00a0 dismissed both on ground of delay as well as on merits.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 69C : Unexplained expenditure-Bogus purchases-No disccrpency between purchases and sales shown -Entire purchase cannot be added-Order of High Court dismissed the apepeal of the revenue is affirmed-SLP delay of 606 days-SLP of revenue dismissed on account of delay as well as on merits. [S. 268A,  Art. 136] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-59019","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-flV","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59019","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59019"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59019\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":59020,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59019\/revisions\/59020"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59019"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59019"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59019"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}