{"id":59471,"date":"2026-04-13T12:33:40","date_gmt":"2026-04-13T07:03:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/patran-foods-p-ltd-v-uoi-2025-347-ctr-363-170-taxmann-com-470-p-hhc\/"},"modified":"2026-04-13T12:33:40","modified_gmt":"2026-04-13T07:03:40","slug":"patran-foods-p-ltd-v-uoi-2025-347-ctr-363-170-taxmann-com-470-p-hhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/patran-foods-p-ltd-v-uoi-2025-347-ctr-363-170-taxmann-com-470-p-hhc\/","title":{"rendered":"Patran Foods (P.) Ltd v.UOI (2025) 347 CTR 363 \/ 170 taxmann.com 470 (P&#038; H)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Post amendment on account of treating notices issued under section 148 as notice under section 148A(b), natural corollary would be that such replies which may be received to notice issued under section 148A(b), would be examined by same Assessing Officer, who had originally issued notices under old regime. Thereafter, same Assessing Officer is required to pass an assessment order under new scheme after giving notice under section 148 of old Act. On writ the Court held that\u00a0\u00a0 a notice which was originally issued under section 148 by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer in terms of old regime and which had been deemed to be issued under section 148A(b) could be continued to be processed by same officer. All writ petitions are dismissed.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-A notice which was originally issued under section 148 by Jurisdictional Assessing Officer in terms of old regime and which had been deemed to be issued under section 148A(b) could be continued to be processed by same officer. [S. 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art.226] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-59471","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-ftd","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59471","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59471"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59471\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":59472,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59471\/revisions\/59472"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59471"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59471"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59471"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}