{"id":59589,"date":"2026-04-17T12:19:16","date_gmt":"2026-04-17T06:49:16","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/manju-arora-v-ito-2025-306-taxman-91-sc-editorial-manju-arora-v-ito-2025-176-taxmann-com-343-delhihc\/"},"modified":"2026-04-17T12:19:16","modified_gmt":"2026-04-17T06:49:16","slug":"manju-arora-v-ito-2025-306-taxman-91-sc-editorial-manju-arora-v-ito-2025-176-taxmann-com-343-delhihc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/manju-arora-v-ito-2025-306-taxman-91-sc-editorial-manju-arora-v-ito-2025-176-taxmann-com-343-delhihc\/","title":{"rendered":"Manju Arora v. ITO [2025] 306 Taxman 91 (SC) Editorial :Manju Arora v. ITO (2025) 176 taxmann.com 343 (Delhi)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The assessment order under section 147 read with section 144 and 144B was passed in the case of the Assessee. Aggrieved by the said order, the Assessee filed a writ application before the Delhi High Court. The High Court\u00a0 held that the petitioner had the alternate remedy of an appeal before the appellate authority and did not entertain the petition. Being aggrieved by the order of the Hon\u2019ble Delhi High Court, the Assessee filed a special leave petition before the Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court. The Hon\u2019ble Supreme Court\u00a0 upheld the decision of the High court\u00a0 as an alternative remedy was available with the Assessee and refused to intervene in the matter.(AY. 2020-21)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 147 : Reassessment-Alternative remedy-Filing appeal-Writ petition was dismissed-SLP of assessee dismissed.[S. 144B,148, Art. 136]  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-59589","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-fv7","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59589","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=59589"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59589\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":59590,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/59589\/revisions\/59590"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=59589"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=59589"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=59589"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}