{"id":60030,"date":"2026-06-02T15:49:23","date_gmt":"2026-06-02T10:19:23","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/cadence-design-systems-india-v-dy-cit-2024-168-taxmann-com-122-2025-482-itr-415-delhihc\/"},"modified":"2026-06-02T15:49:23","modified_gmt":"2026-06-02T10:19:23","slug":"cadence-design-systems-india-v-dy-cit-2024-168-taxmann-com-122-2025-482-itr-415-delhihc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/cadence-design-systems-india-v-dy-cit-2024-168-taxmann-com-122-2025-482-itr-415-delhihc\/","title":{"rendered":"Cadence Design Systems (India) v. Dy. CIT [2024] 168 taxmann.com 122 (\/ (2025) 482 ITR 415 (Delhi)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Allowing the appeal of the assessee, the Court held that the exclusion of the three comparables for determination of arm&#8217;s length price under section 92CA merited acceptance. In so far as the two entities were concerned, the Tribunal had, in the assessee&#8217;s own case pertaining to the assessment year 2011-2012, excluded the two entities TCS E-Serve and Infosys BPO from the list of comparables and consequently were to be excluded for the assessment year 2010-2011.(AY. 2010-11)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 92C : Transfer pricing-Arm\u2019s length price-Avoidance of tax-International transaction-Comparables-Transfer Pricing Officer, including high brand value companies-Functional similarity alone not decisive factor-Exclusion of such comparables in subsequent assessment year-Direction to exclude the two comparables.[S.92CA] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60030","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-fCe","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60030","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60030"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60030\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":60031,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60030\/revisions\/60031"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60030"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60030"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60030"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}