{"id":60383,"date":"2026-06-05T09:36:00","date_gmt":"2026-06-05T04:06:00","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pcit-v-sasken-technologies-ltd-2025-483-itr-49-karnhc\/"},"modified":"2026-06-05T09:36:00","modified_gmt":"2026-06-05T04:06:00","slug":"pcit-v-sasken-technologies-ltd-2025-483-itr-49-karnhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/pcit-v-sasken-technologies-ltd-2025-483-itr-49-karnhc\/","title":{"rendered":"PCIT v. Sasken Technologies Ltd (2025) 483 ITR 49 (Karn)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Dismissing the appeal of the revenue the Court held that the Tribunal had recorded that on the first issue, the Commissioner had misconstrued the facts. On issue Nos. 2, 3 and 4, the Assessing Officer had taken &#8220;possible views&#8221;. The Tribunal was justified in setting aside the order of revision. In CIT v. Amitabh Bachchan, (2016) 384 ITR 200 (SC)\u00a0 the Supreme Court has held that so long as the view taken by the Assessing Officer is a &#8220;possible view&#8221;, it ought not be interfered with by the Commissioner under section 263 of the Income-tax Act, 1961 merely on the ground that there could be another possible view in the matter. (AY. 2014-15)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 263 : Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Assessing Officer taking one of two possible views-Order of Assessing Officer not erroneous-Order cannot be revised. [S. 260A] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60383","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-fHV","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60383","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60383"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60383\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":60384,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60383\/revisions\/60384"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60383"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60383"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60383"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}