{"id":60456,"date":"2026-06-05T19:03:41","date_gmt":"2026-06-05T13:33:41","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/sharp-business-system-through-finance-director-mr-yoshihisa-mizuno-v-cit-2026-484-itr-509-308-taxman-285-348-ctr-1-257-dtr-49-sc-dy-cit-v-pentamedia-graphics-ltd-2026-484-itr-509-308-t\/"},"modified":"2026-06-05T19:03:41","modified_gmt":"2026-06-05T13:33:41","slug":"sharp-business-system-through-finance-director-mr-yoshihisa-mizuno-v-cit-2026-484-itr-509-308-taxman-285-348-ctr-1-257-dtr-49-sc-dy-cit-v-pentamedia-graphics-ltd-2026-484-itr-509-308-t","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/sharp-business-system-through-finance-director-mr-yoshihisa-mizuno-v-cit-2026-484-itr-509-308-taxman-285-348-ctr-1-257-dtr-49-sc-dy-cit-v-pentamedia-graphics-ltd-2026-484-itr-509-308-t\/","title":{"rendered":"Sharp Business System (Through Finance Director Mr. Yoshihisa Mizuno) v. CIT (2026) 484 ITR 509 \/308 Taxman 285 \/348 CTR 1 \/ 257 DTR 49 (SC) Dy.CIT v. Pentamedia Graphics Ltd (2026) 484 ITR 509 \/308 Taxman 285 \/348 CTR 1 \/ 257 DTR 49 (SC) PCIT v. Piramal Glass Ltd (2026) 484 ITR 509 \/308 Taxman 285 \/348 CTR 1 \/ 257 DTR 49 (SC) CIT v. Penatsoft Technolgies Ltd (2026) 484 ITR 509 \/308 Taxman 285 \/348 CTR 1 \/ 257 DTR 49 (SC) Editorial : Sharp Business System v. CIT (2026) 484 ITR 496 (Delhi) (HC) \/ Sharp Business System v. CIT [2012] 254 CTR 233\/211 Taxman 576 (Delhi (HC) set aside. The court remanded the remaining appeals to the repective Tribunals to be heard afresh, having regard to the ratio laid down as per para 32 of the Judgement."},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Allowing the appeal of the assessee the Court held that payment of the non-compete fee, the assessee had not acquired any new business, nor was there an addition to the profit-making apparatus of the assessee. The assets remained the same. The expenditure incurred was essentially to keep a potential competitor out of the same business. Further, there was no complete elimination of competition. Such payment made by the assessee to L and T did not create a monopoly of the assessee over the business of electronic products and equipment. The payment was made to L and T only to ensure that the assessee operated the business more efficiently and profitably. Such payment made to L and T could not, therefore, be considered to be for the acquisition of any capital asset or towards bringing into existence a new profit-earning apparatus. That being the position, the payment made by the assessee to L and T as non-compete fee was an allowable revenue expenditure under section 37(1) of the Act.(AY 2001-02, 2002-03)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 37(1): Business expenditure \u2013Capital or revenue-Advantage for enduring benefit-Non-compete fee \u2013No monopoly achieved-Allowable as revenue expenditure. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60456","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-fJ6","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60456","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60456"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60456\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":60457,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60456\/revisions\/60457"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60456"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60456"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60456"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}