{"id":60480,"date":"2026-06-05T19:12:55","date_gmt":"2026-06-05T13:42:55","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/action-research-for-health-and-socio-economic-development-v-cbdt-2026-484-itr-211-174-taxmann-com-966-orissahc\/"},"modified":"2026-06-05T19:12:55","modified_gmt":"2026-06-05T13:42:55","slug":"action-research-for-health-and-socio-economic-development-v-cbdt-2026-484-itr-211-174-taxmann-com-966-orissahc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/action-research-for-health-and-socio-economic-development-v-cbdt-2026-484-itr-211-174-taxmann-com-966-orissahc\/","title":{"rendered":"Action Research for Health and Socio-Economic Development v. CBDT (2026) 484 ITR 211 \/ 174 taxmann.com 966 (Orissa)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The assessee was required to file the audit report in Form 10B in terms of section 12A read with rule 17B on or before January 15, 2021, with respect to the assessment year 2020-2021, but the same was filed on March 31, 2021 with a delay of seventy-six days. Commissioner rejected the application for condonation of delay. On writ, the court held that there was &#8220;genuine hardship&#8221; faced by the assessee during the relevant period and the refusal to condone the delay invoking power under section 119(2) was an arbitrary exercise of discretion in the fact-situation; the order dated February 17, 2025, passed by the Commissioner (E) was set aside. CIT E) was directed to decide the matter on the merits. (AY. 2020-21)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 119 : Central Board of Direct Taxes-Circular-Dealy in filing audit report-Delay of 76 days-Reasonable cause-Genuine hardship-Force majeure-Circular extending period of limitation-Order of Commissioner rejection of application set aside-Matter remanded to the Commissioner for fresh consideration.[S.12A, 119(2)(b), 139, 143(1), Art. 226, R. 17B, Form 10B]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60480","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-fJu","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60480","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60480"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60480\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":60481,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60480\/revisions\/60481"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60480"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60480"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60480"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}