{"id":60504,"date":"2026-06-05T19:22:42","date_gmt":"2026-06-05T13:52:42","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/uoi-v-misty-meadows-pvt-ltd-2026-484-itr-130-182-taxmann-com-653-sc-editorial-misty-meadows-pvt-ltd-v-uoi-2024-465-itr-630-299-taxman-392-p-hhc\/"},"modified":"2026-06-05T19:22:42","modified_gmt":"2026-06-05T13:52:42","slug":"uoi-v-misty-meadows-pvt-ltd-2026-484-itr-130-182-taxmann-com-653-sc-editorial-misty-meadows-pvt-ltd-v-uoi-2024-465-itr-630-299-taxman-392-p-hhc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/uoi-v-misty-meadows-pvt-ltd-2026-484-itr-130-182-taxmann-com-653-sc-editorial-misty-meadows-pvt-ltd-v-uoi-2024-465-itr-630-299-taxman-392-p-hhc\/","title":{"rendered":"UOI v. Misty Meadows Pvt Ltd (2026) 484 ITR 130\/ 182 taxmann.com 653 (SC) Editorial : Misty Meadows Pvt Ltd v.UOI (2024) 465 ITR 630\/ 299 Taxman 392 (P&#038; H)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p><strong>\u00a0<\/strong><\/p>\n<p>Assessee owned land and entered into separate development agreements with five companies to raise a security deposit towards the development of the land. A search was conducted at premises of assessee and final assessment order was passed under section 153A.\u00a0 Thereafter, a search and seizure operation was conducted at the premises of M3M India Ltd; pursuant to said search, a panchnama was drawn and assessee-company\u2019s name was added to it.\u00a0 Consequently, a notice under section 153A was issued against assessee on the ground that five companies, which had entered into a development agreement with assessee, had subsequently entered into separate agreements with ten other companies and had received substantial amount. Assessing Officer assessed the amount as undisclosed income in hands of assessee and passed an order under section 153A read with section 153D.\u00a0 The assessee filed the writ petition and contended that when there was no search conducted under sections 132 and 132A as against the assessee and only a panchnama reflected the name of assessee which was prepared at the registered office of M3M India Ltd. action of the Assessing Officer in passing second assessment order based on a notice under section 153A without conducting search and seizure operation was unjustified and was to be quashed.\u00a0 Panchnama would be a document which had to be prepared recording articles, material and objects which may be seized as incriminating documents at time of conducting search of premises, thus mentioning name of any company in panchnama would only reflect that documents relating to that company were found during search at premises and could not be treated to mean authorisation issued to authorities under section 132. High Court quashed the assessment order.\u00a0 SLP of revenue dismissed. (AY. 2011-12)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 153A : Assessment-Search or requisition-Warrant of  Authorisation-Panchnama-No search against the assessee-Panchanama reflected the name of the assessee-Panchnama cannot be treated as warrant of authorisation-Assessment order is quashed as without jurisdiction-Existence of alternative remedy-Not bar to entertainment of writ petition where challenge is to jurisdiction exercised by Authority and interpretation of statutory provisions involved-SLP of revenue dismissed. [S. 132,153D, Art.136]  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60504","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-fJS","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60504","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60504"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60504\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":60505,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60504\/revisions\/60505"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60504"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60504"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60504"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}