{"id":60610,"date":"2026-06-08T13:09:36","date_gmt":"2026-06-08T07:39:36","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/laxmanbhai-amarsingh-chavda-v-aud2025-307-taxman-30-guj-hc\/"},"modified":"2026-06-08T13:09:36","modified_gmt":"2026-06-08T07:39:36","slug":"laxmanbhai-amarsingh-chavda-v-aud2025-307-taxman-30-guj-hc","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/laxmanbhai-amarsingh-chavda-v-aud2025-307-taxman-30-guj-hc\/","title":{"rendered":"Laxmanbhai Amarsingh Chavda v. AUD(2025) 307 Taxman 30 (Guj.)(HC)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Assessee, an agriculturist, did not file a return of income. Assessing Officer issued a notice under section 148A(b) for reopening assessment on the ground that assessee had deposited a certain amount of cash in a bank which had remained unexplained. He passed an order under section 148A(d) and also issued a notice under section 148. Subsequently, the Assessing Officer issued a show-cause notice as per section 144B proposing addition. The assessee filed a reply to the show-cause notice. However, the Assessing Officer, without considering the reply, passed an assessment order making an addition. On writ, the Court held that the assessee had already filed a reply to the show-cause notice-Whether non-consideration of reply to the show-cause notice by the Assessing Officer had resulted in breach of principles of natural justice. The order of the Assessing Officer was set aside and directed to pass a fresh order.\u00a0 (AY. 2018-19)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 148A: Reassessment-Conducting inquiry, providing opportunity before issue of notice-Cash deposited in bank-Failure to consider the reply-Principle of natural justice-Order of assessment was quashed and set aside. [S.144B, 148, 148A(b), 148A(d), Art. 226]  <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60610","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-fLA","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60610","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60610"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60610\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":60611,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60610\/revisions\/60611"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60610"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60610"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60610"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}