{"id":60796,"date":"2026-06-18T11:59:40","date_gmt":"2026-06-18T06:29:40","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/riddhi-seva-kendra-v-adit-2025-213-itd-535-kol-trib\/"},"modified":"2026-06-18T11:59:40","modified_gmt":"2026-06-18T06:29:40","slug":"riddhi-seva-kendra-v-adit-2025-213-itd-535-kol-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/riddhi-seva-kendra-v-adit-2025-213-itd-535-kol-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"Riddhi Seva Kendra. v. ADIT (2025) 213 ITD 535 (Kol) (Trib.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>The assesse filed its return of income claiming exemption under section 11. The return was processed under section 143(1) by denying the claim of exemption on the ground that the assessee had filed an audit report in Form No. 10B along with the return of income but the same was required to be filed one month before the due date of filing the return of income, and since the audit report was filed late, the claim of exemption was denied. CIT(A) affirmed the order of the Assessing Officer. On appeal, the Tribunal held that the filing of the auditor&#8217;s report along with the return of income has to be treated as a procedural requirement and, therefore, it is directory in nature and not mandatory.\u00a0 Audit report was available at the time of processing of return, claim under section 11 could not be denied. The\u00a0 Assessing Officer was\u00a0 directed to allow the claim under section 11 as per law and after considering the audit report filed in Form No. 10B (AY. 2020-21)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 11: Property held for charitable purposes-Delay in filing Audit report in Form No 10B \u2013Directory and not mandatory-Audit report was filed before processing of return-Denial of exemption was not justified.[S. 12, 143(1), Form No.10B]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60796","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-fOA","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60796","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60796"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60796\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":60797,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60796\/revisions\/60797"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60796"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60796"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60796"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}