{"id":60999,"date":"2026-06-19T09:36:44","date_gmt":"2026-06-19T04:06:44","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/save-a-family-plan-india-aiswaryagram-v-dcit-e-2025-213-itd-27-cochin-trib\/"},"modified":"2026-06-19T09:36:44","modified_gmt":"2026-06-19T04:06:44","slug":"save-a-family-plan-india-aiswaryagram-v-dcit-e-2025-213-itd-27-cochin-trib","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/save-a-family-plan-india-aiswaryagram-v-dcit-e-2025-213-itd-27-cochin-trib\/","title":{"rendered":"Save A Family Plan (India) Aiswaryagram v. DCIT (E) (2025) 213 ITD 27 (Cochin) (Trib.)"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>Assessee-charitable trust made donations to 72 institutions stated to be institutions duly registered under section 12A. Assessee claimed exemption under section 11 and filed a nil return of income. Assessing Officer accepted the return and passed an order under section 143(3). \u00a0PCIT\u00a0 revised the order on the ground that the \u00a0Assessing Officer had failed to examine the question of eligibility of donations made by assessee-trust to another institution for exemption under section 11. On appeal, the Tribunal held that merely because donee trusts were duly registered under section 12AA, ipso facto, they would not qualify for deduction under section 11. On facts, since the Assessing Officer had failed to examine aspect whether donee trusts were having similar objects as that of the assessee-trust, the order of revision was affirmed (AY. 2014-15)<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>S. 263: Commissioner-Revision of orders prejudicial to revenue-Application of income-Donation to another charitable trust-Revision order affirmed. [S. 11, 12A] <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":3,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_access":"","_jetpack_dont_email_post_to_subs":false,"_jetpack_newsletter_tier_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paywalled_content":false,"_jetpack_feature_clip_id":0,"_jetpack_memberships_contains_paid_content":false,"footnotes":"","jetpack_post_was_ever_published":false},"categories":[21],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-60999","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-income-tax-act"],"acf":[],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","jetpack_shortlink":"https:\/\/wp.me\/p9S2Rw-fRR","jetpack-related-posts":[],"jetpack_sharing_enabled":true,"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60999","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/3"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=60999"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60999\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":61000,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/60999\/revisions\/61000"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=60999"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=60999"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/itatonline.org\/digest\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=60999"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}